|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Lugh Crow-Slave
2317
   |
Posted - 2016.04.27 05:37:18 -
[1] - Quote
Can we please tax compression?
Right now there is very little reason to refine in a citadel that isn't closer to a trade hub and even beyond that there will be plenty of public ones with 0 tax. If ppl can just compress in mine for free why would they ever refine there. A DST can move over 1M of ore after compression.
Beyond that why can't I charge for a service I'm paying to provide
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2319
|
Posted - 2016.04.27 08:23:38 -
[2] - Quote
Rob Kaichin wrote:Ok, so is this: CCP Fozzie wrote:
Unrigged Citadel (in all areas of space): 50%
T1 rigged Highsec Citadel: 52%
T2 rigged Highsec Citadel: 54%
T1 rigged Lowsec Citadel: 55.12%
T2 rigged Lowsec Citadel: 57.24%
T1 rigged Null/WH Citadel: 58.24%
T2 rigged Null/WH Citadel: 60.48%
The new Base or the new Maximum for Reprocessing, and will skills be acting on it? (where they don't know).
These are the bases with maxskills and impart it's over 80%refine in null/wh (been a few days so can't remember exact)
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2320
|
Posted - 2016.04.27 09:09:44 -
[3] - Quote
Jerppu3 wrote:Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Can we please tax compression?
Right now there is very little reason to refine in a citadel that isn't closer to a trade hub and even beyond that there will be plenty of public ones with 0 tax. If ppl can just compress in mine for free why would they ever refine there. A DST can move over 1M of ore after compression.
Beyond that why can't I charge for a service I'm paying to provide Exactly what he said. We have been asking this for quite a while now.
Hell I would settle for a good explenation as to why ccp has decided against this
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2320
|
Posted - 2016.04.27 10:50:18 -
[4] - Quote
Scotsman Howard wrote:Drago Shouna wrote:Otro Willis wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:It's a buff to lowsec, but still a long term death knell to Highsec.
You can't remove citadels to avoid a wardec, they cost the same no matter the area of space, they should give the same reward for use in any area of space since they require the same investment. Otherwise it gives an unbeatable materials advantage to Null/WH's. Which is terrible for the game. Because being next door to Jita isn't an advantage at all. What the hell has Jita got to do with it? I haven't been there in over 2 years, and I doubt I will in the next 2 if i'm here. LOL if you don't understand the importance of Jita to the game economy, then I am sorry for you. All those prices you have been using to sell wherever you are: guess what; they were driven by Jita in some way. Jita sets the tone for the rest of Eve be it null sec or low sec (WH is a bit debatable, but they have never had fully flushed out markets). How many null groups do NOT base their SRP or markets off of Jita prices?
Soon my friend soon the wh markets will rise. And when they do? .....
Yeah they will be driven more or less by jita
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2335
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 00:09:54 -
[5] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Akira Nailo wrote:How Did i know the CCP Fozzie would be behind this. Changing reprocessing to now cost money? We losing all the good Devs and THIS is what we are keeping... Sigh. Fozzie i hope you read this is really do this is now your 2nd **** poor idea (thats being kind) If you have any other great ideas please put them on paper, then light it on fire, and mix the ashes. This one's been requested for a long time, by people running Outposts. So they don't need to gather the minerals and sell them themselves.
so do to lazyness?
an est cost tax is so bad
rather than getting 5% of the minerals for a 5% tax i could get 2%-10% the isk value based on the market that day if they are going to do this estv needs to get better
EDIT: at the very least they could make it a choice
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2355
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 19:06:03 -
[6] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Redneck Herman wrote:This is also the thing that pisses me off. I learned of this on the patch day, they tried to hide it.
They tried to hide it by doing the initial announcement about the feature changing at the beginning of march? If I want to hide stuff, I personally don't start talking about it close to 2 month in advance...
yeah in places that few players actually look rather than in a dev blog.
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2357
|
Posted - 2016.04.30 02:16:29 -
[7] - Quote
lol they couldn't even manage to get all the patch notes right
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2474
|
Posted - 2016.05.08 18:09:22 -
[8] - Quote
doesn't help that it looks like L citadels are going to settle around 18 bill not the 7b ccp talked about. so there is not going to be as many player markets.
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2609
|
Posted - 2016.05.23 05:11:20 -
[9] - Quote
Jitaprice071 wrote:i completly agree with removing this new tax system,maybe making a new one, why not.
because nothing happened like ccp planned.
Jita is the Heart of Eve, it's also a 13 years-old reflex.
Market is now up and down, even some people seems to be not aware of the new huge tax applied and loose a lot of money
-and make others loose a lot of money too-,producers placing sell orders look like livestock smelling apocalypse.
My job, hub traders, will disappears. Until now, we offered logistic comfort. removing it could seriously affect all players' intention to go on.
it has help with production i can now make more if i build from scratch rather than just working with the most valuable link in the chain.
But seriously CCP not only can i not Tax compression but so long as i have a refinery i can't block ppl from using it? if they can dock it can be used. This is just dumb and i really wish i could here the argument to why i can't tax a service in my citadel.
Citadel worm hole tax
|
|
|
| |
|